Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:25

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI - TechCrunch
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Report: Steelers expect to have a deal with T.J. Watt by the start of the season - NBC Sports
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Xbox sale round-up June 3, 2025 - DLC - TrueAchievements
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Need a different reason to eat more fiber? How about microplastics? - The Seattle Times
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What does it mean when someone is pretending to be me?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
PGA Tour Announces Unfortunate News About Multiple Golfers During US Open - Athlon Sports
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.